Post

paradoxa's Blog


Rhythms of Free-Masonry

Rhythm and melody; all around the world, people dance to rhythm(s), and sing along with the melody(s) of songs, which, in the value of the face of things, is fine. Though, in regard an array of these songs, most people have no idea of what is actually being sung. Sure, they're able to comprehend the outer layer (face-value), which is intended to be perceived by the masses, but the inner layer, the purpose of the song's invention, will pass un-noticed due to a lack of knowledge concerning elemental keys of two. (the term knowledge is used here as a lesser of the general sense, far removed from the realm of intelligence. Comprehend is used to replace the derogatory term of understand; it is belittling to stand under anything). These two keys are; 1. knowing that, although all industries, film, social, political, etc., are heavily affiliated with free-masonic endeavors, it is only the music industry which is of interest here, and as such, brings us to; 2. being familiar with free-masonic terminology, slang, and antics in general. There are many other elemental keys, however, the former two keys is all that is needed to enable one to see beyond the outer layer to realize, notice, the inner layer of songs from bands promoted for mass adoration.

Masonic influences in the music industry can be heard within the lyrics of a multitude of songs sung by many of our favorite bands. All of which are unable to be cited here, however, an attempt to reveal the free-masonic rhythms of several such songs will be. These will include songs from the past, and the present. Future songs shall be omitted as one admits to not being a prophetic visionary, even though the status of the future is quoted within some of their lyrics. These songs, too, incorporate both sides of the fence into the lyrics, that is to say, what is, here, attempting to be revealed and, what you hear while listening to it, for example.

The reason why masons, high masons, not the lower bunch, write songs for certain bands to sing, is because of their ego; their ego and the fact that they love to flaunt their doings and what their plans are for the future of the world in the face of the masses, knowing full well that, excluding the few, it will go as previously mentioned; un-noticed! And for people such as myself, attempting to reveal such things, will be perceived by the vast majority (democracy) to be of unsound mind, yet another one of those rambling morons; such is the opinion of the conditioned mind!

The songs chosen to exemplify these masonic influences are; “Imagine,” sung by John Lennon, “Sounds of Silence,” Simon and Garfunkel, “Be Somebody,” Kings of Leon, and “Jacob's Ladder,” performed by Huey Lewis and the News. Parts of each song will be cited (outer layer), interpretively followed with their masonic meaning (inner layer), though, 1 and 2 shall be discussed together as they each relate to the same topic; brain/body chip implantation.

1.Imagine, John Lennon;

Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

….

2.Sounds of Silence, Simon & Garfunkel;

Hello darkness, my old friend
I've come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence

….

And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share
And no one dared
Disturb the sound of silence.

Lennon's “Imagine,” and Simon & Garfunkel's “Sounds of Silence,” are best described here; http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/114845.html

and here; http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/168754.html

However, as these links fail to give reference to the mention of imagining there to be no heaven, no hell, no possessions and the world being as one, further instruction is required to alleviate this matter. In regard no heaven nor hell, this is simply due to the fact that, these places do not exist, at least not in the way with which we have been taught they do; read “Worlds in Collision,” by Immanuel Velikovsky, and “Cutting Through” series 1, 2 and 3, by Alan Watt. Until such viewings, it is simpler to consider, that once chipped, the conceptually systematic use of heaven and hell will become obsolete; for what purpose does a robot require such things, let alone items of materialism? (possessions). When democracy (the majority) has been chipped, and its purpose of function is in full swing, it will be as it was for Mr. Warwick and his wife; people talking without speaking, people hearing without listening; “the world as one,” the hive-mind!


3.Be Somebody, Kings of Leon;

….

locking down the door
with the rhythm and rhyme
I loosen my tie
I loosen my tie

trying to recall
what you want me to say
I shake it your way
I shake it your way

counting on the night
for a beautiful day
I shake it your way
I shake it your way.

This song, “Be Somebody,” relates to the happenings of a mason being initiated. It is required of a mason to know certain secrets which allow them access into the lodge; a specific knocking (rhythm) on the door, specific words (rhyme) of the code, etc. To cut a long story short, the suit and tie are masonic in origin. As the suit is not mentioned in the song, it is only the tie that concerns us here; the tie, as a simple explanation, is a symbolic extension of the noose an initiate bears round his neck during his trial of the first degree. It is a symbolic notation to remind the mason to mind his tongue during discourse outside the lodge, and in the absence of his fellow brethren. In otherwise circumstances, a loose tongue would result in obvious consequences.
So, gaining access into the lodge via the “rhythm and rhyme” not only allows the mason to “loosen his tie”, but loosen his tongue, also!

Within the ceremony, the initiate attempts to impress the Grand Master by “trying to recall, though stumble as he may, what it is he needs to say.” The initiation of the first degree also requires the initiate to wear a blind-fold; he is in the dark, “counting on the night.” When the blind-fold is removed, he is in the light, “for a beautiful day.” “To shake it your way,” however, will not be touched upon here.


4.Jacob's Ladder, Huey Lewis and the News;

I met a fan dancer down in southside Birmingham
She was running from a fat man selling salvation in his hand.

Now he's trying to save me
Well I'm doing all right the best that I can.
Just another falling angel trying to get through the night

Step by step
one by one
higher and higher

Step by step
rung by rung
climbing Jacob's ladder

….

Sing along
send some money
join the chosen few.

Jacob's Ladder refers to several masonic concepts; 1. the man with salvation in his hand, 2. another falling angel, 3. step by step...rung by rung climbing Jacob's Ladder, and, 4. join the chosen few.

The man with salvation (he holds the secrets) in his hand is a high-mason out recruiting worthy candidates, people of use, people with “money;” this man/”woman” (candidate), if “willing”to obey, meets the requirements needed to “join the chosen few.” Each rung of the ladder is a process of degrees; “step by step, rung by rung,” the initiate ascends into the heavens, upon which, becoming angels, perfected, descend back to earth in order to help the hopeless masses of whom are unable to help themselves. Within the confines of each masonic lodge hangs a portrait of Jacob's Dream.


This blog has been hanging around in my PC memory for quite some time now. It is quite obvious that this blog is incomplete, and as such, if there are any questions concerning the above, please, don't hesitate, ask me a question and it shall be answered to the best of my abilities!

Sheeple-Shepherd; Herding the Masses (Part-2)

Control; “The power to influence people's behaviour or the course of events.” Word Power Dictionary, Reader's Digest.


This form of control has been psychologically implemented upon the masses since the most ancient of times. Egypt, for example; the priests of Egypt, through their knowledge of astronomy, of being able to foresee celestial events, and an understanding of psychology, they convinced the people to obey their whims or else, to quote but one consequence, witness the sun blackened from the sky. And in such an event, it was the priests who would deliver the people from darkness by restoring the sun to its former glory. This method today, however, would have no effect on the people's psyche, for we know this event to be a solar eclipse; a natural occurrence.
One may think that this was possible due to the simplistic nature of the people's minds of that time, quite the contrary. In regard psychology, and the obedience of people to look up to, admire, and respect those who appear to have some form of power, those who appear to lead the way, those who “know;” it would be quite easy for these people in power to manipulate, guide and mold, ignorant, conditioned minds. Someone being taught certain facts, of which they were previously ignorant, by an apparent expert would have no reason to dispute the information being conveyed, for they're being taught by an “expert;” they could be told anything. http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/353499.html If the mind was simplistic then, the mind is simplistic now!


However, it is of the opinion that, all scientists agree that the brain (mind) is the most complex computing mechanism on this planet. Why, than, is it that the mind can be so easily fooled? Why is it so easily convinced that a lie, being a lie, is in fact a truth? The words of Adam Weishaupt ring clear; “Oh foolish man, what can you not be made to believe.” Perhaps the “allegorical” character Francis Bacon, author of “Advancement of Learning,” can shed some light on this matter; p.36:


“To have command over brutes as a herdsman is a mean thing; to have command over children as a schoolmaster is a matter of small honor; and to have command over slaves is rather a disgrace than an honor. Nor is the command of a tyrant much better over a servile and degenerate people; whence honor in free monarchies and republics have ever been esteemed than in tyrannical government, because to rule a willing people is more honorable than to compell.”


It matters little what form of government one lives under. Government, in any form, be it a republic, democracy or even communist, they are one in the same, they all harbour a common goal which bonds them together; controlling the masses! No one regime presents to the people a life of freedom, the illusion, perhaps, but never truly. The powers that be don't care for honor, the illusion, perhaps, but never truly. The honor Bacon refers to here is the honor we are expected to bestow upon our shepherds. Democracy is a means to compel our will. Could Bacon offer anything relating to freedom? p.28;


“The merit of learning in remedying the inconveniences arising from man to man, is not much inferior to that of relieving human necessities. This merit was livelily described by the ancients in the fiction of Orpheus's theatre, where all the beasts and birds assembled, and forgetting their several appetites, stood sociably together listening to the harp, whose sound no sooner ceased, or was drowned by a louder, but they all returned to their respective natures; for thus men are full of savage and unreclaimed desires, which as long as we hearken to precepts, laws, and religion, sweetly touched with eloquence and persuasion, so long are society and peace maintained; but if these instruments become silent, or seditions and tumult drown their music, all things fall back to confusion and anarchy.”


The story of Orpheus can be found here; http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/webtexts/eurydice/eurydicemyth.html


Anarchy; “A state of disorder due to lack of government or control.” Word Power Dictionary, Reader's Digest.
A lack of government or control; it appears that, without control, anarchy is a stigmatised term for freedom. So, what Bacon refers to here of course is, three instrumental methods of control, namely, and obviously, precepts, laws, and religion. Precepts; a general rule regulating behaviour or thought. Laws; keeping law abiding citizens in check. And, Religion; a mass of people policing themselves. But these things have been touched with eloquence and persuasion, which makes it acceptable; everything is ok!
Although a couple of hundred years have past since the publication of Advancement of Learning, it also appears that seditions and tumult have not drowned their music; these instrumental methods of control are still in full swing today. Their functionality has not wavered in the slightest. Precepts are still employed, laws still abide the abiding, and religion still results in self-policing. It sounds like the priestly eclipse of ancient Egypt all over again; the mind has been fooled.


As people are unable to rule themselves, it is only “right” that they allow people they have never seen nor met to rule them instead, isn't it! After all, these rulers only have our best interest at heart, don't they! When terror attacks, don't the rulers help us by taking away more of our already diminishing illusory freedoms? Do they not create the crisis which allows them to then present us with the solution...no, the news, “promoted experts” and the like informed us it was terrorists; therefore, it must be so, said the conditioned one!


“Any society willing to give up a little freedom for a little security, deserves none, and shall receive neither.” Franklin.


“We are all trained to distrust and hate foreigners, salute our flag, stiffen up in a wooden obedient way at our national anthem, and prepare to follow the little fellows in spurs and feathers who pose as the heads of our states into the most horrible common destruction.” Wells.

Assistance, Please!

Does any one know the name and location of a building with the following image as its spire? All that is known is that, it does exist, and that it is in the US somewhere! Any indications are welcome, cheers!

                                                                                

Sheeple-Shepherd; Herding the Masses!

In the realm of society, systematic conformity rules. All of societies infrastructural networks have, in most cases, one thing in common; they all have a set path, and anything that strays from that path, unless otherwise being an extension of the same network, is perceived as harbouring non-uniform (uni being one, one-form) qualities. I speak here of course in reference to people. And as such, these people, in some instances, are individualistic in nature. In most cases, the wanderer has been captivated by other systematic norms which adhere to guided conformism. It is regrettable to note, however, that these systematic norms, including the former, are deceptive in nature in that they lead the wandering conformist to something that runs contrary to its initial purpose.


An example of this “contrary” promulgating can be found within the pages of a book entitled “The First Global Revolution,” it is a report put out by the Council of The Club of Rome. The Club consists of 100 members of supposed “experts” from various fields; scientists, heads of state, public figures etc., from around the world. They deal with, and are responsible for the infrastructural constituents of societies. Throughout this book, the Club repetitively refer to the prospect of forming solidarity of the peoples, of uniting the world populous to partake in the venture of a common goal, in short; systematic and environmental sustainability. Unity comes from a nation only where a threat/enemy is perceived across the board of public opinion.


The predicament for the Club was deciding on the threat which would thereby convince the masses to partake in their proposal; the fight against global warming, among other issues, as being top priority in the realm of concern. It does appear, however, that the Club have indeed won-over the minds of the majority, psychological conditioning coupled with propagandised media and the like made short work of that. If this was indeed the purpose of their agenda, and the threat was actually legitimately critical, there would be no reason to oppose landing a hand. The problem here, however, is the fact that these proposals of concern, these attempts to unify the human race, have been conjured up from the realm of nonsense; lies. Granted, the images portrayed on our nightly news programs, newspapers etc. regarding global warming are convincing, indeed. But when understanding that the term "global warming" first appeared in “The First Global Revolution,” and recalling their job of managing the infrastructure of society, surely one can begin to form a vision of “the shape of things to come!”


Chapter V, The Vacuum, p.107-08: “It would seem that men and women need a common motivation, namely a common adversary to organize and act together; in the vacuum such motivation seems to have ceased to exist – or have yet to be found. The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. States have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by designating external enemies. The scapegoat practice is as old as mankind itself. When things become to difficult at home, divert attention by adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.”


 "Invented for the purpose" - A lot of recent and current events spring to mind!


The Club's purpose of scapegoat inventing, in this instance, is the unification of the human race; but where, then, is the enemy of the Club's conception? Again, chapter V, p.115, under the title “The Common Enemy of Humanity is Man,” we find these words; “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat, which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”


So, the Club came up with the "IDEA" that global warming etc. would be the scapegoat (invented for the purpose) used to unite the peoples. It is strange that they finalize their statement by referring to humanity as being the real enemy. This would, and does, cause conflict within the domain of public opinion. In regard the masses, as they have the majority fooled, perhaps they intend to let democracy take its course; the majority always forcing the minority to follow suit, even though the majority are taking action in the name of a falsified notion. But what about “pollution, water shortages, famine and the like?” In short, all these things, and more, can, and in most cases (excluding famine; this is caused by the fact that the powers that be simply couldn't care less), is caused by the technological-coupling of chemtrails and HARRP. Further information regarding these mechanisms can be found here; http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/112564.html


or better still, here; http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/ view audios, transcripts etc.


The moral of this story, then, must be; educate yourself. The news, in any form, is not there to inform you, it is there to form you. In the words of the Club itself; “The powerful extension of the media has extended worldwide during our period; it is employed for the conditioning of populations to accept the acts of dictators...” Likewise statements can be found in various publications regarding the psychology of the masses, Jacques Ellul's “Propaganda” and “The Technological Society,” for example.


In order to tie up the loose ends regarding individualism and systematic conformity, the reader, if interested, is directed here; http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/172566.html

We All Live in a Plato-Styled-Cave!


The following is my analogy of the way in which most people perceive the world around them i.e. incoming information, be it visual or verbal. It will be heavily based on Plato’s Cave and how it relates to our modern world. The example chosen to demonstrate this relation is the stigma surrounding conspiracy theorists, how people perceive them and why this is so.  
 
Perceptual notions are the result of the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system; the central nervous system consists of the brain (responsible for processing information) and the spinal cord. The hypothalamus is the control center for determining responses to the processed information provided by the former. The peripheral nervous system branches throughout the entire body connecting the receptors (in this case, eyes and ears) and effectors (responsible for the response of processed sensory information) to the central nervous system which consists of sensory and motor neurons. The sensory neurons connect the receptors to the central nervous system, the motor neurons connect the central nervous system to the effectors e.g. light passing through the receptors (eyes) is perceived as such by the brain, the effectors respond by making one squint. However, the brain only perceives it as light because it was taught to do so; it is a learned process; the visual was taught by the verbal: we were told it was light from our parents, who in turn were told by their parents. The origin of this learned perception, however, stems from the ancient method of culture creation; from the top down. (see Plato’s “The Republic”). Essentially, perception is based on conditioned reasoning under the guise of evolving systematic guidance (education/indoctrination).
 
For the reader unfamiliar with Plato’s Cave, it shall be cited as follows, though bear in mind, Plato is in discussion with fellow-philosophers who respond at certain points. Most responses will be omitted, while others won’t, which will be distinguishable by single quotation marks. My interpretation shall follow sections of interest, in brackets and italics;
 
“If we’re thinking about the effect of education – or the lack of it – on our nature, there’s another comparison we can make. Picture human beings living in some sort of underground cave dwelling, with an entrance which is long, as wide as the cave, and open to the light. Here they live, from earliest childhood, with their legs and necks in chains, so that they have to stay where they are, looking only ahead of them, prevented by the chains from turning their heads. They have light from a distant fire, which is burning behind them and above them. Between the fire and the prisoners, at a higher level than them, is a path along which you must picture a low wall that has been built, like the screen which hides people when they are giving a puppet show, and above which they make the puppets appear. Picture also, along the length of the wall, people carrying all sorts of implements which project above it, and statues of people, and animals made of stone and wood and all kinds of materials. As you’d expect, some of the people carrying the objects are speaking, while others are silent.
 
‘A strange picture. And strange prisoners.’
 
No more strange than us, I said. Do you think, for a start, that prisoners of that sort have ever seen anything more of themselves and of one another than the shadows cast by the fire on the wall of the cave in front of them? (From birth, a foundation is formed, years of repetition have solidified each belief. Systematic authority rules, unauthorised antics conflict with the foundation set by the former).
 
‘How could they, if they had been prevented moving their heads all their lives?’
 
What about the objects which are being carried? Wouldn’t they see only shadows of these also? (object = truth, shadow = false).
 
‘Yes, of course.’
 
So if they were able to talk to one another, don’t you think they’d believe that the things they were giving names to were the things they could see passing? (False conceptions formed by authority wielded objects).
 
‘Yes, they’d be bound to.’
 
What if the prison had an echo from the wall in front of them? Every time one of the people passing by spoke, do you suppose they’d believe the source of the sound to be anything other than the passing shadow? (T.V and radio are symbolic to the shadow; they are but a reflection of their source. Indoctrinating propaganda, have you had your daily programming yet?).
 
‘No, that’s exactly what they would think.’
 
All in all, then, what people in this situation would take for truth would be nothing more than the shadows of the manufactured objects. (Their conception of reality is based of perceptual falsities. Their world is manufactured by imitations of truth; fake). 
 
‘Necessarily.’
 
Suppose nature brought this state of affairs to an end. Think what their release from their chains and the cure for their ignorance would be like. When one of them was untied, and compelled suddenly to stand up, turn his head, start walking, and look towards the light, he’d find all these things painful. Because of the glare he’d be unable to see the things whose shadows he used to see before. What do you suppose he’d say if he was told that what he used to see before was of no importance, whereas now his eyesight was better, since he was closer to what is, and looking at things which more truly are? Suppose further that each of the passing objects was pointed out to him, and that he was asked what it was, and compelled to answer. Don’t you think he’d be confused? Wouldn’t he believe the things he saw before to be more true than what was being pointed out to him now? (For most people, finding out that their lives have been based on nothing more than lies would be painful. The glare being symbolic to the fact that they would indeed be unable to see, they would refuse to see something which conflicts with, and suggests their foundation was unimportant. Their foundation is their world, their comfort zone. Even if certain things in their world weren’t comfortable, familiarity would form a sense of comfort, it’s always been the way of things).
 
‘Yes, he would. Much more true.’
 
If he was forced to look at the light itself, wouldn’t it hurt his eyes? Wouldn’t he turn away, and run back to the things he could see? Wouldn’t he think those things really were clearer than what was being pointed out? (See previous interpretation).
 
‘Yes.’
 
And if he was dragged out of there by force, up the steep and difficult path, with no pause until he had been dragged right out into the sunlight, wouldn’t he find this dragging painful? Wouldn’t he resent it? And when he came into the light, with his eyes filled with the glare, would he be able to see a single one of the things he is now told are true? (See previous interpretation).
 
‘No, he wouldn’t. Not at first.’
 
He’d need to acclimatise himself, I imagine, if he were going to see things up there. To start with, he’d find shadows the easiest things to look at. After that, reflections – of people and other things – in water. The things themselves would come later, and from those he would move on to the heavenly bodies and the heavens themselves. He’d find it easier to look at the light of the stars and the moon by night than look at the sun, and the light of the sun, by day. (Learning to understand, one step at a time, from beginning to end).
 
‘Of course.’
 
The last thing he’d be able to look at, presumably, would be the sun. Not its image, in water or some location that is not its own, but the sun itself. He’d be able to look at it by itself, in its own place, and see it as it really was. (Comprehending the illusion of reality. Illumined in thought via the dawning of acceptance; the acceptance of truth).
 
‘Yes, unquestionably.’
 
At this point he would work out that it was the sun which caused the seasons and the years, which governed everything in the visible realm, and which was in one way or another responsible for everything they used to see. Now, suppose he were reminded of the place where he lived originally, of what passed for wisdom there, and of his former fellow-prisoners. Don’t you think he would congratulate himself on the change? Wouldn’t he feel sorry for them?
 
‘Indeed he would.’
 
Back in the cave they might have had rewards and prizes for the person who was quickest at identifying the passing shapes, who had the best memory for the ones which came earlier or later or simultaneously, and who as a result was best at predicting what was going to come next. Do you think he would feel any desire for these prizes? Would he envy those who were respected and powerful there? Or would he feel as Achilles does in Homer? Would he much prefer to labour as a common serf, serving a man with nothing to his name, putting up with anything to avoid holding those opinions and living that life?
 
‘Yes.’
 
Suppose someone like that came back down into the cave and took up his old seat. Wouldn’t he find, coming straight in from the sunlight, that his eyes were swamped by the darkness?
 
‘I’m sure he would.’
 
And suppose he had to go back to distinguishing the shadows, in competition with those who had never stopped being prisoners. Before his eyes had grown accustomed to the dark, while he still couldn’t see properly – and this period of acclimatisation would be anything but short – wouldn’t he be a laughing-stock? Wouldn’t it be said of him that he had come back from his journey to the upper world with his eyesight destroyed, and that it wasn’t worth even trying to go up there? As for anyone who tried to set them free, and take them up there, if they could somehow get their hands on him and kill him, wouldn’t they do just that?” (Learning to re-adapt, burying what was true as statements of truth would certainly be deemed laughable by the falsifiers. One would appear somewhat insane. Anyone confronting people with truth, recognised as such, or not recognised, disrupting, appearing to make an attempt at breaking down and destroying their belief system, their way of life, their world, would indeed be met with fierce retaliation, killing you would be high on the list of options. Though, in a “reality” such as ours, mocking, discrediting and labelling such people as crack-pots is far more acceptable, and believed as such, particularly when this mocking, discrediting comes from a source of systematic authority, an “expert,” someone quoted as being qualified for passing slanderous opinions).
 
‘They certainly would.’ 
 
 
To simplify my interpretation further, it will now be related to our modern world and why most people regard information presented by conspiracy theorists as nothing more than nonsense, and in some instances, heretical. For the majority, they are the prisoners in Plato’s Cave, and if it wasn’t for the ability for certain people to wakeup, we all would be! We are born into a system whose foundation has been well established. Its roots stem entirely throughout the infrastructural fabric of society, including the family in which you grow. For generations, methods of perceptual-tampering have been employed upon the masses, some of which, simplistically vast; sociological/psychological propaganda, for example. In order to understand the mechanics of said propaganda, and how simplistic it can actually be, this link is a good place to start; http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/172566.html
Essentially, one generation was taught how to perceive, what is what and who is who etc. and they teach the next. Educational institutes, media, T.V., experts and the like introduce the necessary upgrades required for systematic evolution to occur; the forthcoming nonsense will be accepted due to conditioned norms. Granted, authorised information does contain truth, though, this truth, however, is interlaced with deception.
 
Psychological walls of conditioned scrutiny rise to the occasion and block anything that does not coincide with its given foundational beliefs when certain key-words are heard and or seen. Due to our systematic training, authorised experts have taught us that the word “conspiracy” is one such word, and anything related to this word, for the most part, is perceived as being nonsensical theory; the theorist presents information only to have it discredited by an “authorised expert.” This discrediting would be believed over the theorist’s information for the authorised man carries some form of degree, a paper document certifying his qualified views over the “uneducated” theorist. Consider this;
You and another person wish to understand and learn sociology. You do not attend university, the other person does. You learn the same things; partake in the same methods of study and by the end of it, comprehend the topic equally in all its aspects. The only difference being the university attendant acquires a degree, a paper document. Does this mean that the other person knows more than you about sociology? Are they better equipped at lending opinion regarding such things? No! They are not. The pen being mightier than the sword, however, our systematic status implies that they are.
 
If you’re both placed on a platform under the sociological spotlight presenting a thesis on the infrastructural framework of society, what would the outcome be if the audience learned that you do not wield a degree? Your thesis would become secondary, if that, to that of the degree holder. To relate this clearer, take for example, the man on the soapbox;
 
This is from a book entitled “Straight and Crooked Thinking,” by Robert Henry Thouless (I believe). It was put out in Britain. Thouless speaks of an event which once occurred in Hyde Park, London, where people used to gather around what they called “soapbox speakers” and became an audience for whomever it was on the soapbox at the time; it was tradition. Men wearing old raggedy clothes would give speeches about anything, and the people in the crowd would boo and mock them.
 
Thouless goes on to say; this man could be speaking of things that no-one will ever tell you again. Take this same man, dress him in a suit and tie, build him up with the media and present him in the London Palladium, have the audience listening to good classical music prior to his appearance and a speech to build him up even further, when the man comes out and says the exact same speech he had given at the soapbox, where he was mocked, everyone will sit up with rapt attention because they have been “conditioned” to now listen in a different way!
 
Understand; there are many conspiracy theorists out there who do indeed present a lot of nonsense. But for the legitimate truth-seeker, one attempting to spread the light, their biggest mistake is adopting the term (key-word) “conspiracy.” It initialises the reader/listener to perceive in a different way.
 
There are many aspects in the realm of mind-moulding; this was but a segment in the scheme of things. In the words of Jacques Ellul;
 
“In large societies in which propaganda is at work, opinion can no longer form itself except via the centralized media of information. No opinion is of any consequence unless it is first communicated to the masses by the vast media of dissemination and propaganda, and if it is not assimilated on a massive scale.”
 
“The hardening of opinion soon makes it impervious to all contrary reasoning, proof, and fact. MacDougall makes this point: propaganda that plays on opinion influences that opinion without offering proof; latent opinion subjected to such propaganda (if it is well made) will absorb everything, believe everything, without discrimination. This will cause opinion to pass to the stage of crystallisation, and from that moment on opinion will no longer accept anything that is different.” Jacques Ellul, “Propaganda.”
 
Indeed; we all live in a Plato-Styled-Cave!    

The Summary: Re-visited

The following, in part, is an explanatory of “The Summary,” an earlier blog-post of mine: ……

It is unnecessary to explain it as a whole as there are only two aspects which need further explanation. However, in so doing, the need of explaining the explanations will also occur, and as such, a quote taken from this blog-link: http://paradoxa.blogs.experienceproject.com/178423.html

should suffice quite nicely;

“The predecessors of our modern Governors were known to exist many thousands of years ago, and while the populations of that time were vastly illiterate, the then Governors and the nobilities etc. were not. They communicated with one another via the writing of books, texts and the like. (It has always been this way, our modern Governors still use this method of communication; we, the “profane,” can read these books, too).”

The reader may be pondering as to the reason why some of these books are than written in story form as opposed to simply addressing the matter in the traditional sense; a factual, textual compilation. This is due to the fact that, although the vast majority of people of that time were illiterate, there were a small minority who had the ability to read. For this reason, in the event that the wrong person may lay their eyes upon such information, the texts were written with fiction in mind.

One of these books, we, the profane can read is, “New Atlantis and The Great Instauration,” by Francis Bacon. On pages 74-75, although one is prohibited to quote any part of this book, due to copyright law, it shall be paraphrased as to avoid creating ripples of disturbance!

Bacon proceeds by describing a character, a man who cometh and was one of the Fathers of Salomon’s House, who elaborates to a “new-comer” the technological abilities, and the like, of New Atlantis;

p.74: He professes they have closed-reserves containing all kinds of animals and birds, to which are put through various labours and dissemination. This is done in order to, not only learn what can be done to them, but, also, to man himself. The practice of using poisons and medical approaches are also put to subjection.

p.74-75: Methods are employed which not only result in the extra growth (taller) than the natural form, it can also be employed as a reversed effect (smaller, or stunt) in growth. Reproductive ability can also be impaired, halted or increased. They also profess to the alteration of colour, any colour of choice, and characteristics of species. All of this is accomplished by their will, not by chance. The result of initial methods is known in advance.

 

The parts being referred to in “The Summary,” are;

“We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. This they must never know!”

 and;

“They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always think they are not equal.”

At first glance, the reference to colour being an illusion must seem preposterous, to say the least. However, recalling the words of Bacon’s character; “to learn in animals what can be done to man. And; the alteration of colour and characteristics, by choice, not chance.”

Before proceeding any further, one must first re-visit the past, to the time of the so called creation of Eve and the symbolism of the Caduceus, a rod entwined by two snakes. The Caduceus’ association with medicine stems from the symbolic link between the snake and rejuvenation; a form of re-birth = birth, and as such, coincides with the Caduceus’ alias; the “Double Helix,” which comprises the human genome!

Both these aspects exude classic genetic elements; Eve being the result of genetic experimentation, the Caduceus, in affect, symbolising the human genome.

It is quite clear, by these two examples alone, and long before the “creation” of Eve, that the realm of genetics was well understood, by the select, at least. Indeed, as recently quoted by Dr. Suzuki, a renowned geneticist; “We have the ability, now, to allow someone to live for 500yrs.” How is this possible? Could it be that, for the select, the aging gene has been removed from the cycle of life? Of course it has! And, of course it is not for the masses to acquire such longevity; this wouldn’t coincide with the worth-viewing “Agenda 21,” a plan devised for global depopulation!

Apparently, DNA wasn’t discovered until 1869, by Frederick Miescher. Yet the ancients understood genetics, thoroughly. How is it possible to know about the genome without prior knowledge of DNA? Remember, the story of Adam and Eve can be found within the pages of Gene-Isis!

The elite governors aspire, through any means, to reach their ultimate goal; immortality, in the physical sense, not spiritual. This will be achieved via the removal of the aging gene. They will live forever, bar accidents. They believe they’re gods (God). One of their core teachings is the importance of the “spoken” word. Initiates are taught from the early stages not to get caught in the “spell” of “spelling,” the importance lies in the sound of each word, hence the oral tradition! “And God said, let there be light, and there was light.” In other words, he “spoke” the said into existence; the oral tradition!

According to “The Good Book,” Adam and Eve were the first humans to walk the earth. This story has forever raised the question as to why the varieties of races, nationalities exist, when Adam and Eve surely represented one nationality, being the first people, how could they be anything more? Furthermore, one man and one woman couldn’t possibly create enough offspring to equate to what constitutes the world today, and if this were true, what proof more is needed to conclude that we’re all brothers and sisters; we would indeed be one! It’s not entirely true, but it lends credence to the fact that we’re all human, the land does not separate beneath the sea. Where is the division that separates the people but invisible borders created by the powers that be? I’m from earth, from what world do you reside?

Back to “The Summary.” Colour being an illusion does not refer to the way in which we perceive the colours in our surrounding environment. It refers to genetics; genetically modified people. Being one does not imply that we’re Adam and Eve’s descendant offspring; it implies that we come from the same place; we are of the same ilk.

What the summary parts mean is that long, long ago, our ilk was genetically tampered with, one became many. Remember, p.74: He professes they have closed-reserves containing all kinds of animals and birds, to which are put through various labours and dissemination. This is done in order to, not only learn what can be done to them, but, also, to man himself. The practice of using poisons and medical approaches are also put to subjection.

p.74-75: Methods are employed which not only result in the extra growth (taller) than the natural form, it can also be employed as a reversed effect (smaller, or stunt) in growth. Reproductive ability can also be impaired, halted or increased. They also profess to the alteration of colour, any colour of choice, and characteristics of species. All of this is accomplished by their will, not by chance. The result of initial methods is known in advance.

That is to say, the races were genetically crafted, nationalities were formed. This not only enabled greater control, it also caused a separation of the peoples. From this, apparent differing cultures, religions etc. were also created for the people, solidifying how different we really are from one another. What with our brothers/sisters modified skin colour and physical appearance, who could believe otherwise? Today, through conditioned reasoning, we hate one another, war with one another, kill one another. The real enemy lies not with the people of the general public, of any country. It lies within the heads of a country! As George Orwell states;

“Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship.” (Create the problem, offer the solution= loss of liberty).

In other words, it is not a war of country against country; it is a war of the governments of a given country on the minds of their own people!

 

Even the greatest skeptic can not deny the probabilities of possibilities!

 

(For a detailed account on culture creation, see “The Republic,” by Plato). 


The Summary!

I really hope that this will be taken seriously and considered more than just some piece of ******* jargon. I refrain to use such a word as I wish to avoid initiating the readers walls of conditioned scrutiny from rising to the occasion and clouding their vision.

It was sent to me from a good friend and I feel that I must share it wit you! It sums-up the way in which the ruling elite orchestrate and employ their methods of control. I know that if the vast majority continue on their current path; "sleeping," than, the outcome will be as described in the following!;

 

 

The Secret Covenant, exposed.

 

I have been searching for this document for a long time and since beginning my research, the want/need to acquire this knowledge has grown so much. I am so thankful for finding it to share it with you. A lot of people who have shared this have gotten shut down... there must be a reason why don't you think? Please share this information with those who are awake. 

 

An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception. Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.

 

We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.

 

We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive. Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur. 

 

We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.

 

We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks. 

 

We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.

 

We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.

 

We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air. 

 

They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

 

The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison..

 

The poisons will be absorbed trough their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems. 

 

From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.

 

The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.

 

We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far.

 

We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones. 

 

Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.

 

They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect.

 

When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them its for their help.

 

We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

 

When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future.

 

When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine.

 

We will render them docile and weak before us by our power.

 

They will grow depressed, slow and obese,and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.

 

We will focus their attention toward money and material goods so they may never connect with their inner self.We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may never be one with the oneness of it all.. 

 

Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say. If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives. We will use fear as our weapon.

 

We will establish their governments and establish opposites within. We will own both sides. 

 

We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan.

 

They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their toil.

 

Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure always, for it is the way.

 

We will make them kill each other when it suits us.

 

We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion.

 

We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how.

 

We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are guiding themselves. 

 

We will foment animosity between them through our factions.

 

When a light shall shine among them, we shall extinguish it by ridicule, or death, whichever suits us best. 

 

We will make them rip each other's hearts apart and kill their own children.

 

We will accomplish this by using hate as our ally, anger as our friend.

 

The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from their conflicts we emerge as their rulers. They will be busy killing each other.

 

They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as long as we see fit.

 

We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us.

 

We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths.

 

We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is accomplished.

 

We will continue to make them live in fear and anger though images and sounds.

 

We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this.

 

The tools will be provided by their labor.

 

We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.

 

We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. This they must never know!

 

They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always think they are not equal.

 

Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal.

 

We will take over their land, resources and wealth to exercise total control over them. 

 

We will deceive them into accepting laws that will steal the little freedom they will have.

 

We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever, keeping them and their children in debt.

 

When they shall ban together, we shall accuse them of crimes and present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media. 

 

We will use our media to control the flow of information and their sentiment in our favor.

 

When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects, for they are less than that.

 

They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.

 

We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans, we will promise them eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not of us.

 

The recruits will be called "initiates" and will be indoctrinated to believe false rites of passage to higher realms. Members of these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth. They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us. 

 

For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great titles, but never will they become immortal and join us, never will they receive the light and travel the stars.

 

They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment. This they will never know.

 

The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be able to focus on it until its too late..

 

Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will never know they are our slaves.

 

When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will own them. This reality will be their prison. They will live in self-delusion.

 

When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin.

 

Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have established from time immemorial.

 

But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then. THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW.

 

If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will take action. 

 

They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen. Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter. 

 

This is the secret covenant by which we shall live the rest of our present and future lives, for this reality will transcend many generations and life spans.

 

This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood. We, the ones who from heaven to earth came.

 

This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist. It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.


Care For Some Brain-Damage?

"There is NO healthy dose of mercury." Since this is true, why would anyone seriously consider injecting themselves AND/OR THEIR CHILDREN with it simply because "Authorities" recommend it, and soon will DEMAND it? By all means, Sleep, if you will!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svUXgyHzZqY



The Time Is Neigh!

It is highly recommended to watch the following video. It states clearly, within the first 10mins, the presence and purpose of the much-talked-about swine-flu and its vaccine. If this doesn’t convince you to avoid the propagandised bids to get the public to adhere to such measures, i.e. willingly taking the vaccine because the “experts” insist it’s in your “best interest,” you will, quite simply, be adding another nail in your coffin, perhaps the final nail, sealing your doom.

 

http://www.ecuadorcentral.com/articles/janeburgermeister.html


Proposition;

I bet no-one can listen to just one audio-file from the following site without feeling illuminated afterward. If one takes nothing away from it, they must be severely conditioned; prove me wrong! (:

cuttingthroughthematrix.net/audio.html

 

 


Individualism!

The conceptual consensus regarding the characteristics of true individualism is fairly consistent throughout the social structure of any society. Although, such peoples as those found inhabiting the great jungles, bushes and forests of our world, those without systematic influences or attachments, for such people it is unnecessary to include in the following analogy of true individualism; as they are systematically unattached, they already obtain the characteristics of true individuals. The former relates to anyone who is found dwelling within the web-like structural framework of civilisation, the latter, having attained (since birth) the title of true individuals, will be perceived as such within the forthcoming analysis.

 

Thousands, perhaps even millions, of people throughout the world have either claimed, or heard it claimed, as being an individual. This self-conception, however, is quite often gathered without the guidance of any real self-analysis and virtually no self-comparisons with the surrounding elements that constitute society. Take, for example, the people wearing baggy-jeans, baggy-shirt and reversed cap, in comparison with those wearing black-jeans, a black T-shirt and leather-boots. Although both these character examples consider themselves individuals, neither of the two harbours any immediate recognisable similarities, i.e. appearance, slang, body-language etc. they do, however, have one thing in common, and it is this connection which forms the fundamental element common to all “civilised” peoples; conditioned reasoning.

 

The presence of propaganda in our system is well enough known, be it political; democratic, communist, socialist and the like; media, advertisement etc. however, propagandist mechanisms are used on many levels, and the level of interest here is the method of sociological propaganda. Sociological propaganda, over an extended period of time, say, a generation, is capable of not only creating the environment of ones society; it can form the very customs and habits of a person via suggestion, by-passing the conscious and entering, unnoticed, directly to the unconscious. The person is also inclined to adhere to new choices and judgements, of which is believed to be their own selections. This is merely an effect of the atmosphere created by sociological propaganda. Sociological propaganda ensures the adaptation of the person via the moulding, unconsciously, of their psychological framework and instils in them the willingness for societal conformity. This type of propaganda has been used on the masses for generations, thus the driving-force behind the aforementioned conditioned reasoning.

 

The use of sociological propaganda has been subjected upon people since their maternal-revealment, though more systematic with schooling attendance. Education, it seems, is the real beginning, the birth-place of this quest for acquiring individualistic tendencies, antics, character. Yet, the allotment of oneself to a group can’t happen fast enough. In the way of group formations, all schools contain commonplace reflections; nerds, jocks, popular, unpopular etc. Each person, in each school group, considers themselves an individual. With so many people in one school group harbouring the same characteristics as that in another, what is it that separates them from the former group? An individual is an entity separate from everything else, how is it, than, that a person can believe they’re an individual when the multitude of likewise school groups runs contrary to this belief? The same can be said regarding the characters described earlier; baggy-jeans, black-jeans etc. one being labelled a “Homie,” the other, a “Goth.” With a vast world of said labels, what makes one character of the group more of an individual than another character from the same group? And if this were so, the apparent individual would in turn suggest that the remaining group members were non-individuals; would this bring the remaining group members to no longer consider themselves individuals? No, the truth is, none of them have any connection at all with the definition of individualism; conditioned reasoning has created the mere illusion which convinces them of such.

 

But how is it possible that a tribe of Amazonian natives, for example, are able to be classed as being, since birth, true individuals when they themselves form a group? Since one tribesman alone is an individual, how is it that the remaining tribe-members are individuals, too? When comparing the working elements of the tribe, as a whole, with that of civilisation, the reason is clear. Although any number of natives can constitute a tribe, say, 10, 20, or 60 members, they nonetheless obtain individualistic tendencies. As a tribe, they function as one, they all work to serve the group, to sustain the group, and they survive as a group. It matters not from which family you stem; to help your fellow tribesman is to help yourself. All aspects of the group are catered for by the group. Without these functions, the group would cease to exist; chaos would surely reign!

 

“Civilised” peoples, on the other hand, can hardly be said to function as one, to sustain their society etc. it would be fair to state here, however, that there are certain civilised people who contribute part of their lives to the former functions, albeit with little impact, their contributions are countered with a multitude of systematic conformities, each of which, detrimental to themselves and their surrounding environments. The continued allowance of permitted governors, for example. If the civilised world were to help one another, in all aspects, there would be no apparent need for governing bodies; we don’t need them, they need us. Hence the presence of sociological propaganda; chaos reigns!

 

To view the essence of these drawn conclusions, it is highly recommended that one read “Propaganda,” by the renowned sociologist, Jacques Ellul. Or, click on the link below and discover everything they fail to teach in school; from kindergarten to higher-learning!

 

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com


Consider The Following;

 

Consider this; it has been established to the public that I am more than qualified in the field of diseases and viruses; past, present and plausible coming ailments that threaten civilisation. My “expertise” has been expressed to the public via media, magazine, newspapers and the like; I have been “authorised,” and the vast majority have accepted me as described by the former. Thus, giving me the power of persuasion; and thanks to the vast majority and their acceptance, I now wield great influence.

 

One day, all over the papers and news flashes, there comes the announcement; I present the public with the following dilemma; “forget about the days of the dreaded swine-flu, a much greater threat has risen out of the animal kingdom, and is heading straight for the bulk of the population. It has been called “Kitty-Flu,” which there is no known cure or method of treatment…” 

 

Would you believe this to be true? What with my “authorised qualifications,” it is factual to say, the vast majority would. Indeed, they would believe it wholeheartedly. Their belief, would in turn, create the exact systematic motions as that portrayed in the so-called “swine-flu.”

It would undoubtedly be believed as the vast majority have been conditioned to trust and believe those of authority, those who are qualified, after all, the information came from an expert, did it not?!

                                                         

 

                                                     


Some Personal Thoughts Regarding "The Way Of Things."

The following is a description of the working mechanisms which comprise the complementary constituents of psychology and propaganda. These systematic, humanistic functions are used upon the masses to manipulate, guide and mould, via suggestion, the human psyche. The most likely result causes the individual to come to what they think are their own conclusions and promotes “prescribed” actions or reactions to any given situation. In the following, the term “individual” is used when referring to a person in the general public; those who adhere themselves to authorised relations. When it is used in the classical sense, to imply a person is a “true” individual; those forming their own relations, it will be stated as such.   

 

It is the result of these methods that have trained people to view the world through conditioned eyes; they see only what they have been taught to see, nothing more. The same also applies to that of hearing; they only hear what their trained walls of conditioned scrutiny allows through; the “authorised” version. Many a reader will naturally exclude themselves from this category, however, in many cases; one ascribes contrary to the latter. It is not the intention to belittle the reader, nor is it the intention to adhere condescendence in regard ones worth; that is to say, the cause of this conditioning comes not from an individuals will, but via external sources of influence; be it television, radio or parental deception, a simple misguidance of passing on that which was taught to them. The intention is simple; rather than attempting to “form” the readers mind to a desired shaped pillar of society, it is hoped this will “inform” the reader, allowing them to shape their own minds; the individuals disposition of their psychological framework.  

 

It is rather difficult to elaborate on one technique without incorporating the other into the equation, as previously stated, they compliment each other. Therefore, they shall be discussed in no particular order. In the realm of psychology the psychologist obtains several avenues for mental exploration; the conscious, subconscious and unconscious. Each of these brain levels harbour the potential of being persuaded, either into apparent self-conclusions, perceptions, actions or awareness, among others. The psychologist knows this well, and is likewise trained to exploit this potential through the use of propaganda, social-equality and manipulating the individuals conceptions regarding social-acceptance and a sense of belonging. Most people feel they need to belong, due to psychological conditioning, to some form of group, council or community committee. This, being a social network of sorts, of working together, creates the illusion that one has gained the acceptance of their fellow workers, of whom also seek that of which you crave. The basic definition of psychology is described as; 1: the science that deals with mental processes and behaviour, 2: the emotional and behavioural characteristics of an individual, group, or activity, and 3: subtle tactical actions or arguments used to manipulate or influence another.           

One does not need to see a psychologist to be manipulated; psychological methods can be employed via advertisement, radio, magazines, educational institutes, television etc. for example; Edward Bernays, in his book “Propaganda,” p. 77-78, describes a standard method of influencing the public mind (psychologically) with the assisting hand of propaganda;

“The modern propagandist therefore sets to work to create circumstances which will modify that custom. He appeals perhaps to the home instinct which is fundamental. He will endeavour to develop public acceptance of the idea of the music room in the home. This he may do, for example, by organizing an exhibition of period music rooms designed by well-known decorators who themselves exert an influence on the buying groups. He enhances the effectiveness and prestige of these rooms by putting in them rare and valuable tapestries. Then, in order to create dramatic interest in the exhibit, he stages an event or ceremony. To this ceremony key people, persons known to influence the buying habits of the public, such as a famous violinist, popular artists, and a society leader, are invited. These key people affect other groups, lifting the idea of the music room to a place in the public consciousness which it did not have before….Meanwhile, influential architects have been persuaded to make the music room an integral architectural part of their plans with perhaps a special charming niche in one corner for the piano. Less influential architects will as a matter of course imitate what is done by the men whom they consider masters of their profession. They in turn will implant the idea of the music room in the minds of the general public. The music room will be accepted because it has been made the thing. And the man or woman who has a music room, or has arranged a corner of the parlor as a musical corner, will naturally think of buying a piano. It will come to him as his own idea.”  

This example, although basic, is nonetheless manipulative and effective. It shows quite clearly the simplifications of psychologically influencing the publics mind into accepting “new” ideas, and conforming, like good little sheep, to follow what seems to be in trend at the time; one finds they must mimic their betters, idols, neighbours, and so on, or otherwise run the risk of being labelled the black-sheep of the block, or worse still, an outcast. This would be avoided at all costs as acquiring this label would instil, within the individuals mind, the feeling of not belonging and being socially unaccepted. To acquire acceptance, a sense of belonging, is to display your ability to conform, to toe-the-line, to follow the herd as to avoid being “left behind.” None of these qualities are found within the psychological framework of a “true” individual, none of these qualities are even looked upon conceptually. It is only the vast majority who perceive this concept, they feel they must; it is an effect of their psychological conditioning. William H. Whyte, Jr. a recognized leading figure in the analysis of contemporary American culture provides an example of this in his book “The Organization Man,” p. 7. It is unfortunate, however, that one is forbidden to quote even the smallest part of this book due to copyright law. Such is freedom of speech!

Consider the world as a motherboard, like those found in a computer, the motherboard representing the puppet-masters domain, from which constituent chips stem, these represent organizational instruments used for shaping the social structure and the very nature of our existence. In other words, all means of mental distraction are designed to manipulate the public mind, to insert, via suggestion and leadership guidance, means of stupefying their susceptible audience into following their masters every whim. There may be little objection in certain areas, this, however, is quickly dismissed. One finds it easier to “toe-the-line” as apposed to solidifying the realisation that they are being used; a mere pawn in a global agenda. Creating ripples would only result with their social exclusion, and this is the fundamental reason why the majority refuse to allow themselves to stray from the “herd of social acceptance and belonging.”  

As mentioned previously, the common perception of reality has been downloaded into the public mind via external sources and parental deception. The current generation’s perception differs slightly to that of our parents, as does our parents from their parents. This is due to systematic generational upgrades; this creates avenues for separating one generation from the other, of breaking down the concept of family. This is apparent simply by looking at the associations between the family of today and that of the past. It is rare, in this day and age, to find an entire family sitting round the dinner table. The reader may object to this by saying; “what about all the European families, the religious families, and the like; they still do this.” Indeed, they do. They do this by way of tradition; but whose tradition? It is of the opinion that tradition originates from within the family, and each generation carries it on. If this is true, than what of the Tooth-Fairy, or Santa Clause; It is likely that neither of these traditions began in the readers family, yet, it is just as likely that the reader practices this upon their children, just as it was practiced upon them. For those of a religious nature, it is no surprise if they are found to celebrate Christmas, but what of the non-religious? It’s not their religion, why take on the tradition? The examples could go on for ever, but the reason is simple;

It all stems from that sense of belonging, of being socially accepted. Telling people that you don’t celebrate Christmas, Easter or any of the systematically created “norms,” they look upon you as though you suffer from some unexplainable mental condition; they simply can not comprehend the possibility of someone excluding the “way of things” from their lives. They have been conditioned; they are a constituent conduit of their motherboards programme. 


Educate Yourself: Under Your Own “Conditions.”

 

“The Technological Society,” by Jacques Ellul, p. 435;

 

“We are forced to conclude that our scientists are incapable of any but the emptiest platitudes when they stray from their specialities….Einstein when he spoke of God, the state, and the meaning of life. It is clear that Einstein, extraordinary mathematical genius that he was, was no Pascal; he knew nothing of political or human reality…”

 

Above: Ellul’s statement couldn’t be further from the truth; quite the contrary. Einstein knew nothing of the mathematical world. Everything he is credited with was handed to him from a higher source; he was nothing more than a front man used to introduce such things. That is why, in all his speeches, he spoke not of mathematical theory, but, rather, political conceptions.

 

Take, for example, Isaac Newton’s statement, which can be found in his memoirs; “There is nothing that I have discovered that is not written in the Talmud and inscribed in the walls of Egypt.”

It would, however, be sensible to consider that, when Napoleon and his band of archaeologists went through there to acquire the Rosetta-Stone, the Egyptian inscriptions were then removed. Such knowledge couldn’t possibly be left for “uninitiated” eyes!

 

People are conditioned, through scientific psychological means, to perceive the world as they (the elite) see fit. If it hasn’t been mentioned by the media, or other sources of “authority,” it mustn’t be worthy of recognition. Unimportant information which soon falls into the category of conspiracy theory.

 

An example of this psychological conditioning can be found in a book entitled “Straight and Crooked Thinking,” by Robert Henry Thouless (I believe). It was put out in Britain. Thouless speaks of an event which once occurred in Hyde Park, London, where people used to gather around what they called “soapbox speakers” and became an audience for whomever it was on the soapbox at the time; it was tradition. Men wearing old raggedy clothes would give speeches about anything, and the people in the crowd would boo and mock them.

 

Thouless goes on to say; this man could be speaking of things that no-one will ever tell you again. Take this same man, dress him in a suit and tie, build him up with the media and present him in the London Palladium, have the audience listening to good classical music prior to his appearance and a speech to build him up even further, when the man comes out and says the exact same speech he had given at the soapbox, where he was mocked, everyone will sit up with rapt attention because they have been “conditioned” to now listen in a different way!

 

These are but a few examples of how the puppet-masters guide their herd (the masses) to desired ends. As Edward Bernays puts it; “We are governed, our minds are moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of....It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.” “Propaganda” p. 17.

 

I am a sentient being, I don’t need the media, experts and so on, to inform me, I educate myself. Learn about the world and the mechanisms of their social structure; you will find that things ain’t as they appear in contrast with that presented via mainstream media, promoted government and non-government funded bodies, and all avenues equipped with the ability to condition the psychological make-up of the human being! I will not allow myself, and those I hold dear, to be assimilated due to the ignorance of gullible minds!          

 


Tip-Bit...

                         “The Technological Society” by Jacques Ellul, p. 398;

 

“But future adaptation will be calculated according to a strict system, the so-called “biocracy.” It will be impossible to escape this system of adaptation because it will be articulated with so much understanding of the human being. The individual will have no more need of conscience or virtue; his moral and mental furnishings will be a matter of the biocrat’s decisions.”

 

The above extract is in direct reference to the forthcoming mass-implantation of the brain (RFID) chips. The statement; “his moral and mental furnishings…” reveals but one function these RFID chips harbour; the removal of ones ability to think for ones self, which, in turn, results in the complete absence of ones individuality; a machine awaiting instruction!

 

Now I’m one for freedom (liberty) and safety (security), but I’m not about to give up the very thing that makes me, me; my mind, my individuality. Are you?

 

In the words of Benjamin Franklin (although a freemason himself, these words are nonetheless true); “Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”


Propaganda!

The following are segmented extracts from Jacques Ellul’s book “The Technological Society.” They are taken from the sub-section “Propaganda,” where he elaborates on scientifically designed methods of moving the masses in a desired direction; “their” (Puppet-Masters) direction.

 

p. 366-367: “In addition, human emotions such as hate and resentment are exploited….The will to self-justification, which is latent in every individual, can also be exploited. It involves the need for a scapegoat; but individuals have difficulty finding a personal scapegoat. Propaganda offers them a collective goat to which they are able to transfer evil and sin, thereby feeling justified, authenticated, and purified….we no longer have to create for ourselves enemies to slay. We have enemies, ready-made for us by propaganda, whom it is lawful to kill.”

 

p. 371: “Men fashion images of things…..These images are based on news items which, as is the case in much of the world, are “faked.” Their purpose is to form rather than to inform.”

 

p. 372: “….Man will be led to act from real motives that are scientifically directed….he will be brought to sacrifice himself in a real world, but for the sake of the verbal universe which has been fashioned for him….the essence of propaganda is to act upon the human subconscious but to leave men the illusion of complete freedom.”

 

p. 375: “Through propaganda, we can train a man not to kill or not to drink alcohol; or we can train him to kill or to smoke opium.”

 

 

It is clear that, from the above statements, provided by an authorised economist, these are the very methods that were used prior, during and after 9/11. A sadistic governmental (Puppet-Master slaves) attack on their own citizens. Their way of implanting the “reality” of TERRORISM in the minds of the masses. It worked quite well, didn’t it? Or did it?  

 

As H. G. Wells puts it; “We are all trained to distrust and hate foreigners, salute our flag, stiffen up in a wooden obedient way at our national anthem, and prepare to follow the little fellows in spurs and feathers who pose as the heads of our states into the most horrible common destruction.”

 

If we all helped each other, there wouldn’t be an apparent need for government. We don’t need them; THEY NEED US!


Heed the Call.

The adjoining link leads to a site which, at first glance to the average consumer, would appear to be nothing more than another typical conspiracy platform; this, however, would be a standardized, conformist conception brought about through a life of systematic indoctrination.

The site is owned by a man named Alan Watt. He, from a young age, has devoted his life to the unveiling of that which has been kept hidden, before our very eyes, for centuries; TRUTH! There is a saying; when one hears/sees the truth, one knows it to be true! This is true even where there is a complete absence of the fundamentals of the topic at hand.

 

Alan, in his blurbs, transcripts and what not, gives reference to “authorised” books one can read which lends credence to the information being conveyed in the former unveiling. Although numerous books are suggested to the reader, three of which suffice quite firmly when it comes to verifying said credence; (1) “The Technological Society” by Jacques Ellul, (2) “The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley and (3) “Ages in Chaos” by Immanuel Velikovsky.

 

These books, The Technological Society in particular, will leave one in a predicament; one is forced to conclude one of two things; one must either forget what they have been taught all their lives through systematic educational institutions, promoted “experts” and the perpetual hypnotic strobes emitted by the media and accept what they have read, heard and learnt through Alan and quoted books, or; they, through conditioned reasoning, will dismiss and ignore the light going off in their head as heretic. The programmed mental framework implanted by your superiors will override what you know to be true as it contradicts “THEIR” current foundational belief system.

There are those, however, that find not only the strength, but the courage to smash through this false belief allowing them to re-programme, re-create a true foundation, upon which they build their own, true structural belief system.

 

It is at this point where the mass-consumer gains the potential to re-acquire their individuality. Only here, through the enlightenment of true knowledge, can the reader break free from the technique of herding the masses; one is set free from the social-flock and no longer harbours the resemblance of a sheep. One is then compelled to assist those who are truly “left behind” and are unable to see through the web-of-lies which lays motionless under the guise of wool upon their eyes. Thus is the reason behind these very words. It is time to break free, wake-up and re-claim your individuality and the ability to think for yourself; the time is nigh!

 

 

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com


Poltergeist.

Poltergeist activity is said to originate from the confusion of adolescent, pubic emotions; emotions which exude the very nature of this phenomenon as a means of release, as though emitted directly from the youth in question.

It has come to my attention, through methods of observation and unintentional participation that, the origins of the former seem to exceed the boundaries of adolescent youth by asserting itself within the frontiers of adulthood, thus the phenomenon of poltergeist knows no bounds in relation to age; it appears to exist in all areas harbouring true (or believed to be true), strong emotion. An example of this is as follows;

 

Say, for instance, a man believes something to be true, something most disheartening, and even though he came to these conclusions with the complete absence of evidential convictions, he nonetheless perceives them as fact. Now, say he dwells on these beliefs to the point of mental depravation, to the point of being incapable of rational subjugation, would this not constitute, to some degree, the need of a release mechanism, perhaps an unmistakable resemblance to that of poltergeist phenomenon? My assertion is, yes, it would and does.

 

The man, unbeknownst to him, has deployed unforeseen forces into his immediate atmosphere. Consequently, people in this atmosphere, those who not only bear witness to these transparent forces, but experience them physically, have cause to seek safety as they are the ones at the heart of the man’s disheartening belief, in affect, making them a direct target of excess depravation, one of many initiators for poltergeist activity.

    

Does this make sense to anyone?


Momentarily Departed

 

 

Hello, everyone. My reason for the following involves a blend of want and hesitation. Those of you that are familiar with the contents of my blogs, and took from them what is hoped would be taken, may find themselves in a state of discontent with the announcement of discontinued blog instalments. This, however, is quite easily rectified. For those of you that find the former somewhat ineffectual, the latter will be of no consequence.

 

For the majority, my blogs are extracted directly from two books, books which one considers most highly as they exude the very essence of that which has been kept hidden, before our very eyes, for centuries; Truth.

There is much to be learnt in the way of awareness; awareness is the first “stepping-stone” on the path to truth, for awareness is the state of awaked ness, which in turn is the state of consciousness. Truth, eternal truth, can only be perceived with a conscious mind, wherein, and whereby, the truth being seen/heard, one knows it to be true, even where there is a complete absence of the basic fundamental knowledge of the topic at hand.

 

My thoughts could continue on a path regarding such things for an eternity, and, although there is a vast realm of information still to be conveyed, my conscience interdicts me from doing so as there is an element of fairness which bestills my hand. My suggestion for the aforementioned rectification is, to follow the link below and be guided as to how to purchase a combined set of books entitled “Cutting Trough,” volumes 1, 2 and 3.

My blogs exclude volume 3. The 3rd volume reveals the esoteric (true) meanings of Revelations.

 

It is sincerely hoped that one finds it in their mind of minds to purchase these books. One would not only be wise at heart, but, in doing so, assisting someone well deserving in being given the ability to keep sharing his knowledge.

 

Some feedback regarding the above is welcomed!

Note: All blogs below this one, excluding "Global Warming," are courtesy of Alan Watt, creator and owner of the adjoining link.

 

www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com


 


The Great Seal

 

As the pyramid stands proud towering over a wasteland, the United States brings in the divine order from above using the ‘RULE’ of LAW enforcing it on the unenlightened populace (chaos) of the world. The light of Lucifer signifies rebellion of an intellectual elite who regard the will of the profane (the uninitiated) as chaos.

 

 

Put the two sides together; you have a few interesting points to ponder: 1. It is a type of compass and square; 2. A type of the High Priest with breastplate; 3. The two wings form the container used in the rights of Osirus, from which issued the symbol of the deity, an asp, (serpent) representing the ‘phallus’ of Osirus. This was later substituted for the eagle. The two are interchangeable. When the Old Testament was compiled (in Egypt) the constellation Scorpio was a serpent; the meaning being the same, biting with poison of the Sun of God at the Autumnal equinox.

 

Novus Ordo Seclorum is supposed to mean ‘New Order of theAges,’ yet the spelling of seclorum is wrong, and the CABAL who put this together were no dummies.

Saeculorum refers to the generative life of a man, set at 33 1/3 years. Seco means to amputate, to cut or rip apart. Clorum refers to ties that bind, or religio. So much for ‘the Christian foundation of America,’

In typical freemasonic/cabalistic fashion, you can read backwards, forwards etc.. The first letters of Novus Ordo Seclorum, backwards is SON. To reveal all the symbolism, numbers etc. would take another book in itself.

 

 

The New World Order used to be symbolized in ancient times along with the Great Pyramid, which wasn’t so much as capped, although they say it was. The mistake they made was in the measurements because one side is actually lower than the rest, but also because the capstone is above and the eye of Lucifer is in the middle, the one who has the light. The capstone is the heavens coming down to the earth; as above so below, also symbolized by the number eight, which also means “money and power” by the elite at the top. They used the eagle as well and you'll find that in the fictitious symbol of the tribe of Manasseh from the Old Testament, you have the eagle, his wings spread out and his claws. In one claw it holds the olive branch, meaning it has the ability to make peace, only there are thirteen fruits on that particular one. In its other claw it has the arrows. It means it can fire the arrows to make war.

 

The U.S. copied that right into their other great symbol for the seal and all law enforcement used that at the top, that particular eagle. It's also got a shield over the body because the body, that which is comprised of it, where the real members who run things, are always hidden from view – hidden from the public view. You'll find the same symbol in the Rothschild coat of arms. Look carefully and you'll find it also has the same symbol hidden in there of the eagle, only they put five of the fruits in one claw and five arrows in the other to represent not only the five points of freemasonry but the five sons of old Amschel Rothschild. That's what it's about. This is an old, old system going back thousands of years. Professor Carroll Quigley, who was the historian for The Council on Foreign Relations, talked on tape to one of his students about this. He did say, after pooh-poohing the whole thing, he said it is strange that they are using a symbol that was used in the occult circles thousands of years ago, meaning the Great Pyramid. He also mentioned the strange fact that they put it on the dollar bill.

 

 

RE is to do again, when you have re, and it's RE-PUBLIC, you see. It's another con on the public. You would be amazed when you read the whole story of the Founding Fathers. They knew the history of every other country. They knew the ancient histories too. In fact they said they looked at all the old systems of government and thought that Rome had the best of the lot, ancient Rome. Which happened to be about 70 percent slaves and you also had the Senate, which was an aristocracy. They ended up taking the land off all the people at the end. Of course they used the eagle too. The word "senate" is an Egyptian word. The senet is actually a chess floor. It's a chess game. It comes from the Egyptian word, the black and the white squares, so you always get two opposing sides; and sure enough, as soon as the War of Independence was over, before you know it they started up an opposition and copied the exact same system that was already basically in Britain with the Whigs and the Tories.

 

In ancient times they knew the trick of division. They knew that the public would join this group or that group. The trick was giving you the groups that you'd identify with, with always the right spokesperson to say what you were thinking. It's very simple. It's never failed. Why should it fail, really, with the majority of the public and the symbol of the eagle which is ancient – an ancient symbol going back for many thousands of years and has come down through the centuries through Rome. Prior to that, it was in Egypt, too, and then the Roman Empire, to the United States and the Russian system. They have the eagle as well.

 

In high Masonry, the eagle is one like the falcon that can symbolically go as high as the sun and look into the face of the sun. That's what it means; and you'll find the symbol of the arrows and the olive branch very revealing. Very old symbol, you'll find it in the Old Testament, if you care to look, and you should ask yourself why they picked that one. The war and the peace, the arms can create war or peace.

 

The wings are the parties left and right, male and female. These are the terms that they use. Emotion versus logic – that's what they mean by it. They're very sexist, of course, and they really hate females at the top.

The body is covered by a shield – the body of the bird is covered by a shield. The body is hidden. The real body is hidden. You see the head above, but, again, in Masonic terms you can figure it out quite simply. The head below, the real virile power is covered. You don't get to see that.

In ancient Egypt, they had two eyes sometimes on some of their symbols of pyramids. When the top eye was open, the bottom was closed and vice versa. The public get to see what they're meant to see, and nothing more.


1-20 of 52 Blogs   

Previous Posts
Rhythms of Free-Masonry, posted November 27th, 2010
Sheeple-Shepherd; Herding the Masses (Part-2), posted August 29th, 2010
Assistance, Please!, posted August 4th, 2010
Sheeple-Shepherd; Herding the Masses!, posted July 12th, 2010, 1 comment
We All Live in a Plato-Styled-Cave!, posted May 23rd, 2010
The Summary: Re-visited, posted May 4th, 2010
The Summary!, posted October 2nd, 2009, 4 comments
Care For Some Brain-Damage?, posted October 1st, 2009
The Time Is Neigh!, posted October 1st, 2009
Proposition;, posted September 30th, 2009
Individualism!, posted September 28th, 2009
Consider The Following;, posted September 17th, 2009
Some Personal Thoughts Regarding "The Way Of Things.", posted September 11th, 2009
Educate Yourself: Under Your Own “Conditions.”, posted August 29th, 2009
Tip-Bit..., posted August 26th, 2009
Propaganda!, posted August 24th, 2009
Heed the Call., posted August 21st, 2009
Poltergeist., posted August 2nd, 2009
Momentarily Departed, posted July 20th, 2009, 1 comment
The Great Seal, posted July 8th, 2009
From 1 Religion 2 Another, posted July 4th, 2009
Rhodesian Bankers & Mithraism, posted June 21st, 2009
Astral-Myth, posted June 11th, 2009
There's Something Fishy..., posted June 10th, 2009
Star Words!, posted June 4th, 2009
Mythodiac!, posted May 31st, 2009
Predictive Programmable Perception!, posted May 27th, 2009
Way-key-Way-key!, posted May 25th, 2009
More Than Words!, posted May 24th, 2009
Mytholigion!, posted May 22nd, 2009
Sweet Liberty Transcripts; Extract – 5, posted May 21st, 2009
Sweet Liberty Transcripts; Extract – 4, posted May 18th, 2009
Sweet Liberty Transcripts; Extract – 3, posted May 17th, 2009
Sweet Liberty Transcripts; Extract – 2, posted May 16th, 2009
Sweet Liberty Transcripts; Extract – 1, posted May 16th, 2009
Sweet Liberty Transcript Extracts (Introduction), posted May 15th, 2009
Breast-Plate and Royalty, posted May 10th, 2009
Initiation by Degrees, posted April 26th, 2009
Esoteric Terminology; Part-2, posted April 25th, 2009
History or His Story? (continued), posted April 24th, 2009
History or His Story?, posted April 23rd, 2009
Mass Control, posted April 20th, 2009
Language Foundations., posted April 16th, 2009
Transliterations, (continued)., posted April 15th, 2009
Transliterations!, posted April 12th, 2009, 1 comment
Elite Reasonings, posted April 10th, 2009
Some Personal Notions, posted April 9th, 2009
Blurb Blog, posted April 8th, 2009
Brain-chip Implant, posted April 6th, 2009
Antcient Religious Aspects, posted April 5th, 2009
1-50 of 56 Blog Posts   

Blogroll
Here are some friends' blogs...

Help
How to Embed Photos in your Blog Embed Photos How to Embed Videos in your Blog Embed Videos